AI GPU Benchmark Results
Every benchmark number in our database, with its source and evidence type. Filter by workload or evidence type; sort by any column. Independent benchmarks come from third-party reviews and standardized databases (MLPerf); community results are labeled reproducible when the run config is published, estimated when approximated.
Filter results
100 benchmark results
| GPU | Workload | Model / config | Result | Evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4090 | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Llama-2-13B · UL Procyon AI Text Generation (TensorRT) (Standardized UL Procyon suite; same lab platform (ThreadRipper 7980X, driver 571.86); output rate 92.853 tok/s) | 5,013 score | Independent benchmark0.85 | StorageReview GPU Reviews |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Llama-3-8B · UL Procyon AI Text Generation (TensorRT) (Standardized UL Procyon suite; same lab platform (ThreadRipper 7980X, driver 571.86); output rate 150.039 tok/s) | 4,849 score | Independent benchmark0.85 | StorageReview GPU Reviews |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Mistral-7B · UL Procyon AI Text Generation (TensorRT) (Standardized UL Procyon suite; same lab platform (ThreadRipper 7980X, driver 571.86); output rate 183.266 tok/s) | 5,094 score | Independent benchmark0.85 | StorageReview GPU Reviews |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Phi-3.5-mini · UL Procyon AI Text Generation (TensorRT) (Standardized UL Procyon suite; same lab platform (ThreadRipper 7980X, driver 571.86); output rate 244.343 tok/s) | 4,958 score | Independent benchmark0.85 | StorageReview GPU Reviews |
| GeForce RTX 5080 | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Llama-2-13B · UL Procyon AI Text Generation (TensorRT) (Standardized UL Procyon suite; same lab platform (ThreadRipper 7980X, driver 571.86); output rate 83.653 tok/s) | 4,790 score | Independent benchmark0.85 | StorageReview GPU Reviews |
| GeForce RTX 5080 | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Llama-3-8B · UL Procyon AI Text Generation (TensorRT) (Standardized UL Procyon suite; same lab platform (ThreadRipper 7980X, driver 571.86); output rate 136.177 tok/s) | 4,424 score | Independent benchmark0.85 | StorageReview GPU Reviews |
| GeForce RTX 5080 | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Mistral-7B · UL Procyon AI Text Generation (TensorRT) (Standardized UL Procyon suite; same lab platform (ThreadRipper 7980X, driver 571.86); output rate 163.598 tok/s) | 4,635 score | Independent benchmark0.85 | StorageReview GPU Reviews |
| GeForce RTX 5080 | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Phi-3.5-mini · UL Procyon AI Text Generation (TensorRT) (Standardized UL Procyon suite; same lab platform (ThreadRipper 7980X, driver 571.86); output rate 209.459 tok/s) | 4,400 score | Independent benchmark0.85 | StorageReview GPU Reviews |
| GeForce RTX 5090 | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Llama-2-13B · UL Procyon AI Text Generation (TensorRT) (Standardized UL Procyon suite; same lab platform (ThreadRipper 7980X, driver 571.86); output rate 134.502 tok/s) | 6,591 score | Independent benchmark0.85 | StorageReview GPU Reviews |
| GeForce RTX 5090 | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Llama-3-8B · UL Procyon AI Text Generation (TensorRT) (Standardized UL Procyon suite; same lab platform (ThreadRipper 7980X, driver 571.86); output rate 214.285 tok/s) | 6,104 score | Independent benchmark0.85 | StorageReview GPU Reviews |
| GeForce RTX 5090 | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Mistral-7B · UL Procyon AI Text Generation (TensorRT) (Standardized UL Procyon suite; same lab platform (ThreadRipper 7980X, driver 571.86); output rate 255.945 tok/s) | 6,267 score | Independent benchmark0.85 | StorageReview GPU Reviews |
| GeForce RTX 5090 | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Phi-3.5-mini · UL Procyon AI Text Generation (TensorRT) (Standardized UL Procyon suite; same lab platform (ThreadRipper 7980X, driver 571.86); output rate 314.435 tok/s) | 5,749 score | Independent benchmark0.85 | StorageReview GPU Reviews |
| NVIDIA B200 | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Llama-2-70B · FP8 · TensorRT-LLM (MLPerf v5.1) (MLPerf v5.1 server scenario, 8x B200 HGX host (throughput is per-host, not per-GPU)) | 101,611 tok/s | Independent benchmark0.85 | MLPerf Inference Results |
| NVIDIA B200 | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Llama-2-70B · FP8 · TensorRT-LLM (MLPerf v5.1) (MLPerf v5.1 offline scenario, 8x B200 HGX host (throughput is per-host, not per-GPU)) | 101,246 tok/s | Independent benchmark0.85 | MLPerf Inference Results |
| NVIDIA B200 | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Llama-3.1-405B · FP8 · TensorRT-LLM (MLPerf v5.1) (MLPerf v5.1 offline scenario, 8x B200 HGX host (throughput is per-host, not per-GPU)) | 1,660 tok/s | Independent benchmark0.85 | MLPerf Inference Results |
| NVIDIA B200 | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Llama-3.1-405B · FP8 · TensorRT-LLM (MLPerf v5.1) (MLPerf v5.1 server scenario, 8x B200 HGX host (throughput is per-host, not per-GPU)) | 1,280 tok/s | Independent benchmark0.85 | MLPerf Inference Results |
| RTX 6000 Ada | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Llama-2-13B · UL Procyon AI Text Generation (TensorRT) (Standardized UL Procyon suite; same lab platform (ThreadRipper 7980X, driver 571.86); output rate 78.532 tok/s) | 3,957 score | Independent benchmark0.85 | StorageReview GPU Reviews |
| RTX 6000 Ada | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Llama-3-8B · UL Procyon AI Text Generation (TensorRT) (Standardized UL Procyon suite; same lab platform (ThreadRipper 7980X, driver 571.86); output rate 138.62 tok/s) | 4,026 score | Independent benchmark0.85 | StorageReview GPU Reviews |
| RTX 6000 Ada | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Mistral-7B · UL Procyon AI Text Generation (TensorRT) (Standardized UL Procyon suite; same lab platform (ThreadRipper 7980X, driver 571.86); output rate 166.633 tok/s) | 4,255 score | Independent benchmark0.85 | StorageReview GPU Reviews |
| RTX 6000 Ada | LLM inference (tokens/s) | Phi-3.5-mini · UL Procyon AI Text Generation (TensorRT) (Standardized UL Procyon suite; same lab platform (ThreadRipper 7980X, driver 571.86); output rate 228.359 tok/s) | 4,508 score | Independent benchmark0.85 | StorageReview GPU Reviews |
How these numbers are sourced
Every row links to its original source and carries an evidence type plus a confidence score. Independent benchmarks come from third-party reviews (Tom's Hardware, TechPowerUp, Puget Systems) and standardized databases (MLPerf); manufacturer benchmarks are vendor-published figures; community results are reproducible when the run config is published, unverified otherwise — always labeled EST when estimated. Read the full benchmark methodology.
Compare any two GPUs head-to-head in the comparison tool, or browse value rankings.